Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ fsid: 715 ]

Total 715 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [ADSM-L] Filespaces appearing for nodes that have never backed up (score: 2)
Author: "Vandeventer, Harold [BS]" <Harold.Vandeventer AT DA.KS DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:22:16 -0500
I believe I've seen similar when the node was renamed. At least in a Windows environment. The filespaces were ID'd with the former name. Maybe a backup did run? -- Harold Vandeventer Systems Programm
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-07/msg00135.html (15,434 bytes)

382. [ADSM-L] Filespaces appearing for nodes that have never backed up (score: 2)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:21:24 -0400
Recently, I was asked to delete 2-nodes that were accidentally defined and never used. When I tried to remove the node, it said "filespaces exist" When I do a "q filespace", it returns info for a com
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-07/msg00132.html (14,582 bytes)

383. Re: [ADSM-L] EXPORTING clients (score: 2)
Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:22:15 -0400
It's possible that your tapes are dropping out of streaming mode and shoeshining, in which case moving tape to disk, and then exporting disk to tape could speed things up. -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-2
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-07/msg00046.html (16,268 bytes)

384. Re: [ADSM-L] EXPORTING clients (score: 2)
Author: "Hughes, Timothy" <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:57:00 -0400
Thanks paul, Yes, We are doing Server-to-tape exports. I did notice a couple times long input tape mounts on the destination TSM SERVER one was around 6,000 seconds another around 14,000 seconds and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-07/msg00045.html (15,347 bytes)

385. [ADSM-L] Trying to delete a filespace??? (score: 2)
Author: "Minns, Farren - Chichester" <fminns AT WILEY DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:09:40 +0100
Hi all I'm trying to delete the following filespace and having no luck at all. The command I'm using is as below and I'm not getting any joy. Any ideas? Regards Farren delete filespace CHI-AS-SCCMEUR
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00153.html (16,438 bytes)

386. Re: [ADSM-L] fastest delete backup syntax (score: 2)
Author: "Meunier, Yann" <yann.meunier AT CAISSEDESDEPOTS DOT FR>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:20:40 +0200
Hi Keith, Why you don't make your delete with the administrative command line ? This is more effective ! :) But, it's will work only if your filesystem is a "mount point" (Net share/Unix File System
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-10/msg00173.html (16,442 bytes)

387. Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions (score: 2)
Author: Henrik Vahlstedt <shwl AT STATOIL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:00:41 +0200
Good! Instead of trying to explain this properly in an email I refer to the author of adsm quickfacts plus the BA client guide, Classic restore vs No Query restore. //Henrik --Original Message-- From
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-09/msg00050.html (18,937 bytes)

388. [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions (score: 2)
Author: Niklas Lundström <niklas.lundstrom AT SWEDBANK DOT SE>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:08:04 +0200
Thanks to Henrik Wahlstedt this got solved. Henrik, tack för hjälpen och telefonsamtalet, jag har faktiskt inte fått nåt mail från dig... Restore processing finished. Total number of objects restored
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-09/msg00049.html (18,044 bytes)

389. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete backupset volumes question (score: 2)
Author: "Conway, Timothy" <Timothy.Conway AT JBSSA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:56:16 -0600
Once you've deleted the backupset, the next expiration frees the tapes. 73, Tim Conway JBS USA | 1770 Promontory Ci | Greeley, CO 80634| USA Direct: 970-506-7998 | Fax: 970.336.6195 email: Timothy.Co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-08/msg00245.html (13,899 bytes)

390. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete backupset volumes question (score: 2)
Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:20:54 -0400
Tim Thanks, Had to use the following command DELete VOLHistory TODate=TODAY Type=BACKUPSET VOLume=C00130 FORCE=Yes Does Expire Inventory work with backupsets and can you be specific about expiring a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-08/msg00200.html (12,837 bytes)

391. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete backupset volumes question (score: 2)
Author: "Conway, Timothy" <Timothy.Conway AT JBSSA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:06:16 -0600
Well - you can't delete by backupset name. I think I read once where you can specify volumes in an undocumented option, but that's irrelevant. Expire inventory. 73, Tim Conway JBS USA | 1770 Promonto
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-08/msg00199.html (12,288 bytes)

392. [ADSM-L] Delete backupset volumes question (score: 2)
Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:00:37 -0400
Hello all, I removed some backupsets using the admincenter (gui) when I refresh the table it doesn't show that the backupset exist however I still see them when I do a q volh type=backupset (example
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-08/msg00198.html (11,554 bytes)

393. [ADSM-L] Comparing notes on NAS CIFS proxy backups. (score: 2)
Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:01:40 -0400
Hey there, O TSMers. I'm chewing on some performance questions (We don't really know if they're "problems" yet) with some of our NAS backups. Basically, we don't have broad enough experience to know
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-07/msg00298.html (11,883 bytes)

394. Re: [ADSM-L] ANS1357S in a mixed Netware/Linux cluster environment (score: 2)
Author: Günther Schwarz <guenther.schwarz AT UNI-HAMBURG DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:21:37 +0200
Am 30.06.2010 17:24, schrieb Richard Sims: The information is muddled, in that you're saying that you're running a mixed cluster with both Linux and Netware, with both clients (at different levels) p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-07/msg00010.html (16,687 bytes)

395. Re: [ADSM-L] ndmp going to tape instead of disk (score: 2)
Author: Cameron Hanover <chanover AT UMICH DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:38:53 -0400
This is hackery at it's worst, or best, depending on your point of view. This is how we got around the 8.7TB limit: Backups were going to instance macc-4-1. Set up a new instance, macc-4-3, as a virt
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-06/msg00074.html (15,988 bytes)

396. Re: [ADSM-L] ndmp going to tape instead of disk (score: 2)
Author: Cameron Hanover <chanover AT UMICH DOT EDU>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:09:59 -0400
For what it's worth, after some go-rounds with IBM development, it appears there's an 8.7TB limit being hit somewhere. That's why the backup is going to tape rather than disk. They are currently inve
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-06/msg00063.html (14,384 bytes)

397. Re: [ADSM-L] Force a Exchange Restore (score: 2)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 06:51:05 -0400
Christian, It seems the backup may not have completed successfully. There is not enough information here to know the answer. Please open a problem with IBM service. They will be able to examine the T
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-05/msg00226.html (13,910 bytes)

398. [ADSM-L] Force a Exchange Restore (score: 2)
Author: Christian Svensson <Christian.Svensson AT CRISTIE DOT SE>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:20:30 +0200
Hi, This is probably a question from Del. My environment is following TSM Server: 6.1.3.1 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Client Level: 6.1.3.0 and TDP version 6.1.1.0 Exchange version: 2003 with SP2 But i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-05/msg00225.html (12,232 bytes)

399. Re: [ADSM-L] ndmp going to tape instead of disk (score: 2)
Author: "c.hanover" <chanover AT UMICH DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 08:45:01 -0400
My understanding of an NDMP differential backup is that TSM assumes the backup will be the full size of the filesystem at the beginning of the backup, and places it accordingly. If that's the case, t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-05/msg00161.html (13,581 bytes)

400. Re: [ADSM-L] ***SPAM*** [ADSM-L] ndmp going to tape instead of disk (score: 2)
Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:00:33 +0200
On DISK type storage, TSM can't split a transaction over multiple volumes, you need FILE type storage to be able to do that. Since NDMP dumps are a single transaction..... -- Met vriendelijke groeten
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-05/msg00139.html (12,757 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu