Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ fsid: 715 ]

Total 715 documents matching your query.

361. [ADSM-L] Correct equation for the sum of q occ (score: 2)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 06:11:56 +0000
Hi to all I want to figure the correct calculation of the amount of data for a node, when running the q occ command here the output tsm: ADSM2>q occ mnhl_cluster Node Name Type Filespace Name FSID St
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-07/msg00117.html (12,984 bytes)

362. Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL gui takes 20 min to display inactive (score: 2)
Author: Alex Paschal <apaschal5 AT FRONTIER DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:56:13 -0800
Hi, Steve. If restoring a file takes multiple small volumes in one pool, but only one large volume in another pool, TSM will choose the pool with the fewest volumes/mounts required, even if the small
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00183.html (15,828 bytes)

363. Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL gui takes 20 min to display inactive (score: 2)
Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:36:01 -0500
Thanks, Steve. I checked, and the node does have backdel=y. it almost acts like it is going to the copypool rather than the diskpool for the meta data, but that makes no sense. -steve s Hi Steve. Che
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00177.html (14,839 bytes)

364. Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL gui takes 20 min to display inactive (score: 2)
Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:38:32 +1100
Hi Steve. Check to make sure that the node has backdel=yes specified. I had one SQL server that was on a legal hold for 4 years and the restore screen took that long to come up because of the large n
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00160.html (13,581 bytes)

365. [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL gui takes 20 min to display inactive (score: 2)
Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:26:44 -0500
Tsm server 6.2.4.0 Tsm client 6.2.3.0 Tdp client 6.3.0.1 Windows 2003EE x64 Our DBA's are complaining that when they have to use the TDP gui to restore older databases by selecting "active/inactive",
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00156.html (12,868 bytes)

366. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 2)
Author: Maurice van 't Loo <maurice AT BACKITUP DOT NU>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:52:35 +0100
I saw this in multiple environments and as long it's not that copy has less objects than primary, I actually don't care ;-) Is it possible that if a file exists in multiple aggregates (i.e. big files
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00085.html (13,139 bytes)

367. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 2)
Author: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:19:17 +0000
No move data involved. In fact, the problem persists after deleting all the copy pool volumes for this node and doing a fresh backup stg. David I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00062.html (13,843 bytes)

368. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 2)
Author: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:17:35 +0000
As the q occ shows, there are two storage pools. nr-pvl is the primary and nr-ofl is the secondary. David how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg) the other thing is check
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00059.html (13,571 bytes)

369. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 2)
Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:18:42 -0800
I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from one primary pool to another, the data in the copy pool stays intact. I don't think there is a way to expire it other than through the normal nod
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00051.html (13,302 bytes)

370. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 2)
Author: Chavdar Cholev <chavdar.cholev AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 00:20:13 +0200
how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg) the other thing is check expire inventory process for errors Chavdar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00049.html (13,071 bytes)

371. Re: [ADSM-L] FW: query occ vs select from occupancy (score: 2)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:18:19 -0500
I suspect this: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC81110 Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-11/msg00083.html (15,619 bytes)

372. [ADSM-L] FW: query occ vs select from occupancy (score: 2)
Author: Paul van Dongen <Paul.vanDongen AT VANCIS DOT NL>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:51:00 +0000
Hi, Before someone tells me that used two different nodes, this was the result of a wrong replace action. I can assure that both commands were directed to the same node name Met vriendelijke groet /
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-11/msg00081.html (13,982 bytes)

373. [ADSM-L] query occ vs select from occupancy (score: 2)
Author: Paul van Dongen <Paul.vanDongen AT VANCIS DOT NL>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:18:28 +0000
Hi TSM people, I saw some uncommon output from a Q OCC command for a large node this morning and I would like to ask if any of you saw this before: Server is 5.5.5.2 on AIX. Query occupancy gives me:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-11/msg00080.html (13,302 bytes)

374. Re: [ADSM-L] netezza nzbackup connector for TSM (score: 2)
Author: Tim Brown <TBrown AT CENHUD DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:05:20 +0000
Stef, Much appreciated, 5.5.4 did the trick. Just one question. For now I have to share the netezza backups with other nodes in the same storage pool . I plan on eventually having netezza in its own
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-10/msg00118.html (13,082 bytes)

375. Re: [ADSM-L] database backup and dr plans (score: 2)
Author: Tim Brown <tbrown AT CENHUD DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:37:09 -0400
I had tried that prior and couldnt get it working, I revisited it and now it is. Thanks to java, Juan Valdez version. But when the process is running it states PROCESS_NUM: 1093 PROCESS: Database Bac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-08/msg00090.html (15,145 bytes)

376. Re: [ADSM-L] Question Tsm for VE (score: 2)
Author: Kevin Kettner <kkettner AT DOIT.WISC DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:13:07 -0500
I was trying to figure some of this stuff out a while ago. I think I stole some of this from somewhere (maybe even this list) and added it to my own stash of documentation. One very important thing t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00184.html (17,133 bytes)

377. [ADSM-L] Question Tsm for VE (score: 2)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:54:16 +0000
Hi to all Did anybody know how to actually see the correct amount of data store in a storage pool with Tsm 6 dedup. When running the conventional command tsm: POSTBACK>q occ haifa_datacenter got: Nod
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00183.html (14,900 bytes)

378. Re: [ADSM-L] Select or Query help (score: 2)
Author: Ben Bullock <BBullock AT BCIDAHO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:25:15 +0000
It looks like a select from the database. To make my best guess, I would think it was going against the backup table and selecting the BACKUP_DATE, HL_NAME & LL_NAME. tsm: ADSM>run q_columns backups
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00068.html (15,181 bytes)

379. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Export Node not exporting certain files (score: 2)
Author: "Hughes, Timothy" <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:10:47 -0400
Also having the export issue with the following ANR0569I Object not processed for LOGICIANQ2: type=Backup,file space=LOGICIANQ2\SystemState\NULL\SystemState\SystemState, object=\\logicianq2\c$|\WINDO
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-03/msg00200.html (12,795 bytes)

380. [ADSM-L] TSM Export Node not exporting certain files (score: 2)
Author: "Hughes, Timothy" <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:04:37 -0400
Has anyone ever had a issue where TSM export suspend itself when trying to export certain files to another TSM Server? I have noticed the exports seems to suspend itself when it gets to the following
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-03/msg00197.html (12,245 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu