Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:14:30 -0600
Well, I have no idea. At this point, I think you ought to get in touch with support. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: And
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:38:15 -0400
Still no joy with the EXPORT. I am pretty much back to square-1. Export fails with: 10/17/2002 20:57:44 ANR9999D AFCPUTIL(1683): ThreadId<3609> Row not found for bitfile 0.5885060. Andrew Raibeck <st
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:19:05 -0400
Thanks for the suggestion about the ADMIN CLI. I can't seem to find a current Messages manual. The one I have does not have that number in it. So, I went back to all of the listed NODES and checked t
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:53:17 -0600
Hi Zoltan, Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: storman AT us.eyebm DOT com
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:45:20 -0400
Based on a variety of comments here, I just jumped from TSM OS390 V4.1.4 to TSM z/OS V4.2.2.13. If you recall, I had an EXPORT issue (for which I received absolutely *NO* reponses). Well, things seem
Hi *, o.k. when this is normal with the new version I will change also the parameter! You are right. This is very often and I reduce it to 1 per day. The library on this server has only few volumes,
Hi, This was some of the things that changes in one of the upgrades, and one of the reasons we turned detailed off... Regard, Karel ps Reclamation once every hour??? Nice that you can, but why? --Oor
Hi Karel, thanks for your answer. Here for and after the update: tsm: ADSM_OERAG02>q act begind=-2 search=ANR4391I Date/Time Message -- -- 11/03/03 15:00:26 ANR4391I Expiration processing node ADSM_O
Author: "Hughes, Timothy" <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:45:07 -0400
Here is another export, I compared the q occupancies together and the query file space together. Notice on this one the numbers for the (q occu) are a lot closer but not exact do the numbers have to
Author: "Conway, Timothy" <Timothy.Conway AT JBSSA DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:04:49 -0700
I hate outlook. Saw that message as top of the list unread - 2 weeks old. That does sometimes happen with odd names (odd for the host OS). In that case, the best thing to do is use the fsid for speci
Author: "Conway, Timothy" <Timothy.Conway AT JBSSA DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:03:34 -0700
That does sometimes happen with odd names (odd for the host OS). In that case, the best thing to do is use the fsid for specifying the original name. For some reason, it's much more forgiving in spec
Author: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:30:28 -0700
Thanks again Richard The FSID is TSM's internal identification number for the file system, within the node. It's a physical identity, independent of the filespace name. If you rename the filespace, i
Thanks Richard, This is windows, so It might not behave like the rest of the world. I'm not sure how it will handle the FSID, Will it retain the current FSID 4 and use that fsid for the new drive, o
Author: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:07:06 -0700
Thanks Richard, This is windows, so It might not behave like the rest of the world. I'm not sure how it will handle the FSID, Will it retain the current FSID 4 and use that fsid for the new drive, or
Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:23 -0500
Thanks Arnaud ,Schaub & William! I think it's finally working! It was a combination of what Arnaud and William said. Arnaud, I used the exact same syntax as the one used by the Gui and but it gave me
Richard, If I am understanding you correctly, you have performed the following Database backup to tape of a TSM server version 5.1.1.0 You have then tried to restore this database backup of a TSM ser
Author: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:31:23 +0100
Hi Richard! You didn't mention it, but I assume the restore was followed by an upgradedb? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Hi All, I've got a strange problem when I try do dele
Author: Richard van Denzel <RvanDenzel AT SLTN DOT NL>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:19:41 +0100
Hi All, I've got a strange problem when I try do delete old filespaces. The scenario: I've made a backup of the old 5.1.1.0 database. On the new system I installed TSM 5.2.6.3 on the new system and r
Author: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GLOBE Center CSC" <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:54:30 +0100
Hi, you will be able to delete with TSM server 5.2. René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center SD/ESN Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) tél +41 (0)21 92