|
Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things
2004-02-20 09:36:44
Local Subnets only is what I have setup right now.
|
|
| Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser AT de.ibm DOT com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
02/20/2004 04:21 AM
Please respond to nv-l
|
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
cc:
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things |
Christopher,
It depends on the netmon options -X and -A.
serversetup -> netmon -> Range of automatic discovery: Local Subnet Only,
Backbone, All Networks
Oliver
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Christopher J |
| | Petrina" |
| | <cjp8@meadwestvac|
| | o.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-nv-l@lists.|
| | us.ibm.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 19.02.2004 23:18 |
| | Please respond to|
| | nv-l |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com |
| cc: |
| Subject: [nv-l] Unmanaged things |
| |
| |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Greetings
Q1: Why on a fresh discovery with none of the switches in setup
configured to laod something as unmanaged would I find an entire segment
unmanaged. I was looking through the maps as the devices and segments
were being found, and found 2 segments that were unmanaged since no one
could have manually done this I assume it was generated by netview. My
question is how did it do this and why?
I know there is a switch in the serversetup -> config netmon daemon that
says manage objects loaded by loadhost. We have that set to yes.
Thanks
Chris Petrina
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________
|
|
|
