Re: [Veritas-bu] Compressed Vs. Uncompressed
2010-06-23 10:42:55
IMHO
Client side compression takes more overhead on the client.
Hardware compression puts the overhead on the tape drive.
(never use both! Never never)
I use hardware compression, tape drives do it just fine. And nothing special
to do for restores.
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Adrian
Soetanto
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:42 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Compressed Vs. Uncompressed
Dear experts,
What are the advantages & disadvantages between using compressed and
uncompressed backup in Symantec NetBackup / Backup Exec?
Especially when doing a restore from compressed backup image, besides it will
take longer to restore, will it need a different method of restoration?
Please give me some explanation about each of compression by hardware &
software.
I'm afraid that we need some different steps to restore from compressed backup
images.
Thank you for helping.
--
Best Regards,
Adrian Soetanto
PT. Bentoel Prima - Infrastructure Staff
Jl. Raya Karanglo - Singosari, Malang
Tel. (+62-341) 298 774
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|