|
Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.
2008-11-09 19:54:53
Personally, I like NOM, it reports on any Policy changes, tape drives down, shortage on blank media, and so on. Then some of that I used to script, now comes with it at no cost. I have the second master server connected to it and now I can see how the remote site is performing as well.
Boris
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote:
I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5? In what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and has anyone got it configured in a cluster?
After the Customer Forum in Roseville at the end of October, Erica convinced me to put it up. Although I generally like NOM, we haven't had much success with it and the we've got an open case where it seems to contribute to tipping over our master server (and yes, it's a separate server). Right now, we've got NOM turned off.
YMMV, obviously.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|
