NOM can be I/O intensive at times and VM doesn't virtualize VM too well.
YMMV!

Thanks, 
Rockey J. Reed 

You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day.  Marian Wright Edelman

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
ddierickx
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 5:01 AM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM.....



ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] wrote:
> How any masters are you monitoring?


only 1 (one) for the moment, NOM doesn't need to be fast for us, so it
is not really an issue at this point in time.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by ddierickx AT fedex DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu