Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.0 question

2006-02-25 18:43:17
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.0 question
From: Greg.Hindle AT constellation DOT com (Hindle, Greg)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:43:17 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C63A65.40474E28
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Is it true that in 6.0 ndmp data and regular data can be written to the
same tape?  Also I have heard that in 6.0 ndmp drives can be seen by all
the filers instead of them being defined 1 or two at a time to a single
filer. Almost like all the drives in the robot are virtually defined to
the filer. Currently we have 2 tapes drives defined to each filer and
our backups take forever because we only have 2 drives defined. Is there
a way in 5.x to have all the drives in a robot being seen by a single
filer to make the backups run faster?


Greg
>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, pr=
ofessional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the=
 addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the informat=
ion in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CE=
G-IP1

------_=_NextPart_001_01C63A65.40474E28
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6617.47">
<TITLE>Netbackup 6.0 question</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Is it true that in 6.0 ndmp data and regul=
ar data can be written to the same tape?&nbsp; Also I have heard that in 6.=
0 ndmp drives can be seen by all the filers instead of them being defined 1=
 or two at a time to a single filer. Almost like all the drives in the robo=
t are virtually defined to the filer. Currently we have 2 tapes drives defi=
ned to each filer and our backups take forever because we only have 2 drive=
s defined. Is there a way in 5.x to have all the drives in a robot being se=
en by a single filer to make the backups run faster?</FONT></P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Greg</FONT>
</P>

<pre>&gt;&gt;&gt; This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may con=
tain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended =
solely for the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not us=
e the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify =
the sender. CEG-IP1
</pre></BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C63A65.40474E28--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>