Hello KD

Here is my points against TSM:

1. You can't do restores from the TSM server, not even from the commandline.

2. You can only have one session running to client scheduler (TSM bpcd)

3. Restores takes very long time to start, because the client have to search 
the server database over the network.

4. Restores are slow because the client updates the server database over the 
network.

5. There is no job monitor, quick status overview. 

6. You only get completed, missed or failed on a schedule and no indication 
of the problem.

7. There no logs to speak of on the clients and as far I know no VERBOSE 
option.

I probably find some more points next time I have to work on one of our TSM 
customers. 

Regards
Michael

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:44:33 -0500, Denton, Kevin M wrote
> Is anyone aware of any documentation out there that is pro 
>  Netbackup versus TSM?
> 
> My management seems to have played a  few rounds of golf with some 
>  IBM reps or something. I'd like to find some selling point versus 
> TSM. I've done some poking around and  came across a  couple 
> articles but they actually leaned more towards TSM....
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> KD
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)