Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Problems with NB 4.5 and RH9 workaround [repost]

2003-12-01 11:00:43
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Problems with NB 4.5 and RH9 workaround [repost]
From: David Rock <dave-bu AT graniteweb DOT com> (David Rock)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:00:43 -0600
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Cris Rhea <crhea AT mayo DOT edu> [2003-12-01 09:42]:
> >=20
> > Cris Rhea wrote, in part:
> > > I'm running NB4.5 (FP5) with the workaround posted for RH9 clients.
> > >=20
> > > All seemed OK, but I recently noticed that incremental backups are
> > > actually doing full backups.
> >=20
> > I haven't seen this one, but the workaround I posted works for only som=
e=20
> >   systems (certain library levels, we presume). We recently updated a=
=20
> > number of our (NBU working) RH9 systems to find NBU no longer works ...=
=20
> > and no workaround has become evident. :-(   We are backing up those=20
> > systems by other means (rsync, etc.).     cheers, wayne
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
> Thanks for the info.
>=20
> It's only going to get worse with Fedora/RHEL/etc....

To be fair, I think RHEL will be BETTER as we move forward, since RedHat
will be focusing on that as THE offering, which should make it easier
for Veritas to write for it.

Now Fedora on the other hand... ;-)

--=20
David Rock
david AT graniteweb DOT com

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/y2WrMrO4/Yb/xwYRAnHSAJ4tHqXASSA5so4XXjGZsWHA8oqm5wCfWYWU
o0k/DgPac9MXM7BlGhvtrBg=
=u2/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--