[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
2003-06-23 12:36:26
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput |
From: |
DMoses AT leviton DOT com (Moses, Darby) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:36:26 -0400 |
Ahh ok!!! Thanks.
Thanks,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
-----Original Message-----
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:29 PM
To: 'David Chapa'; Moses, Darby; Quarantine; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn
DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
I wouldn't think the 15K/1K difference would be that large, but David is
pointing you in the right direction with tuning. I guess I really didn't
completely answer your question by not mentioning tuning. There are
**lots** of things that affect backup speeds. Whatever you do, you generally
can't compare one application type to another. Comparing FTP and NBU is apples
and oranges. Comparing similar applications like ArcServe and NBU is valid,
though.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: David Chapa [mailto:david.chapa AT adic DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Moses, Darby ; Quarantine; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
go to support.veritas.com and search for tuning guide. After you have done
some "tweaking" test your results.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Moses, Darby
To: Quarantine; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Sent: 6/23/03 9:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
But should the differences be that large? I have another client that will ftp
to the Veritas server at 15,000KB/s but the Veritas backup is 1000KB/s.
Thanks,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
-----Original Message-----
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Moses, Darby; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
You shouldn't expect that. Different methods of file access and transfer have
different overheads. For example, download a large FTP file from an
off-network location using Internet Explorer and then download the same file
using a standard FTP client like WS_FTP. You'll usually see a marked
difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large file between Windows
machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the same file using a
utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is notoriously inefficient and
slow.
Matt
________________________________________
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Veritas-BackUp support group
If I can transfer a file using FTP from my Veritas server to a client at 5000
KB/s should I get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from NetBackup for
my backups from that client?
Regards,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718) 281-6999
DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, David Chapa
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput,
Moses, Darby <=
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Lowell Fafard
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
|
|
|