Re: [Networker] Tape Positioning by Record is Disabled on AIT Drives??????
2003-12-17 03:09:12
Matt Temple wrote:
>You may have answered a question that just came up. I don't recycle
>tapes, I relabel them, so their Volume number (ex linux.0350) keeps
>going up. Do we now agree that thisw is the case: Recycling doesn't
>implement new block sizes but relabeling does? (When you relabel, even
>if you don't remove the volume first, I think the new blocksize is
>implemented.
Let me annoy you: If you relabel in Networker, you re-use the volume name.
If you label, you get a new volume name.
greetings,
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
Re: [Networker] Tape Positioning by Record is Disabled on AIT Drives??????,
Tarjei T. Jensen <=
|
|
|