Networker

Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?

2003-04-25 19:40:12
Subject: Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?
From: Gaddy <xy.0815 AT GMX DOT NET>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:40:11 -0400
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 03:35:26 -0400, Tarjei T. Jensen
<tarjei.jensen AT KVAERNER DOT COM> wrote:

>>After checking a couple of internal Legato sources to be quite certain the
>>algorithm is as follows...
>>
>>nsrclone SSID1, SSID2, SSID3.....SSIDX  will move data from the source to
>>the target without any change to the data and no tape thrashing.....
>>
>>If a tape has 4 savesets interleaved, the data chunks are moved
>>in order and laid down exactly without any de-deinterleaving - and then
>>re-interleaving the data.
>>
...
>What will networker do if we pipe the saveset IDs to nsrclone?
>
>e.g. report_to_generate_ssids_to_be_cloned | nsrclone
>
>Is this the same as 1 or 2 above?
>

This (and all the 'nsrclone ... -f ssid_list_file' examples) is
EXACTLY what is described in case #1.
(no change, no de-interleaving, no tape rewind)

Case #2 is something like:
SsidList=$(mminfo ... -r ssid)
for Ssid in $SsidList
do
  nsclone ... $Ssid
done
(many tape rewinds, everything gets de-interleaved)

Regards

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=