Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox
2003-03-10 08:51:39
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:53:01 -0800, Carston Locher <clocher AT LEGATO DOT COM>
wrote:
>Davina is actually slightly incorrect in that it is not the #
>of nsrjb processes allowed. For instance if you set this value
>to 4 and kicked off one nsrjb operation all of the 4 tape drives
>would be used (if you were performing operations on 4 or more slots).
You are of course totally correct, I should have put operations not
processes. I hang my head in shame and apologise for attempting to mislead
the list. :-(
>Please give me the name of your consultant. You don't have to
>send it to the group. I just want to make sure the person gets
>more education before they are allowed to talk to any more
>customers.
A very subtle way of putting this.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Davina Treiber
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Fowler, Carter
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Robert Maiello
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Andrew McGeorge
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Lewis, Terry {Info~Palo Alto}
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox,
Davina Treiber <=
- Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox, Davina Treiber
|
|
|