Networker

Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox

2003-03-10 08:51:39
Subject: Re: [Networker] max parallelism for a jukebox
From: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:51:36 -0500
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:53:01 -0800, Carston Locher <clocher AT LEGATO DOT COM>
wrote:

>Davina is actually slightly incorrect in that it is not the #
>of nsrjb processes allowed.  For instance if you set this value
>to 4 and kicked off one nsrjb operation all of the 4 tape drives
>would be used (if you were performing operations on 4 or more slots).

You are of course totally correct, I should have put operations not
processes. I hang my head in shame and apologise for attempting to mislead
the list.  :-(

>Please give me the name of your consultant.  You don't have to
>send it to the group.  I just want to make sure the person gets
>more education before they are allowed to talk to any more
>customers.

A very subtle way of putting this.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=