Well, let's put it like this: It's not unusual... The
algorithm for marking each file for recover isn't,
shall we say?, the fastest in the world and can easily
take a couple of hours, depending on how many files
you select.

I suggest you look into saveset recovers 'til next
time you have to perform a recover of this size. It'll
be faster... :)

// Matts

 --- Craig Baxter <baxter9 AT LLNL DOT GOV> skrev: > Dell
Win2K file server (2 600Mhz processors, 1.5GB
> memory) with Networker
> 6.1.  We had a RAID5 set blow away two drives.  We
> repaired the RAID and
> then proceeded to attempt to recover 133,000 files
> on 200GB worth of data.
> After marking the entire drive for recovery, the
> index scan alone has taken
> 3 hours.
>
> Is this normal to take this long?
>
> TIA,
> Craig
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff"
> command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's
> Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html
> where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
>
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

_____________________________________________________
Gratis e-mail resten av livet på www.yahoo.se/mail
Busenkelt!

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=