Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed

2008-07-29 09:23:01
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Frank Sweetser <fs AT WPI DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:21:45 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Frank Sweetser wrote:

> It's possible to almost get into that situation, but Bacula will detect and
> prevent it.  Whenever an incremental or differential job runs, it checks the
> catalogue for a matching full backup.  If it doesn't find a matching full
> backup, the current job is upgraded to a full backup.

This behaviour is flawed for large backups. If repeat failed levels is
enabled, then if an incremental is scheduled and the full is still running
the increental will turn into a full - same with the next incremental.

This easily gets into a cycle of endless full backups.

AB


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users