Re: [BackupPC-users] experiences with very large pools?
2010-02-19 10:32:08
Gerald Brandt schrieb:
>
> >
> > I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> > pool with > 10 TB.
> >
> >
> > > * I have recently taken my DRBD mirror off-line and copied the BackupPC
> > > directory structure to both XFS-without-DRBD and an EXT4 file system for
> > > testing. Performance of the XFS file system was not much different
> > > with, or without DRBD (a fat fiber link helps there). The first
> > > traversal of the pool on the EXT4 partition is about 66% through the
> > > pool traversal after about 96 hours.
> >
> > nice ;)
>
> You may want to look at this thread
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT
> net/msg17234.html
I've seen this thread, but the pool sizes there are max. in the lower
TB region.
Ralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|