Dne Monday 02 of July 2007 18:40:06 Julian C. Dunn napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:07 +0200, Radek Brich wrote:
> > On Monday 02 of July 2007 16:09:55 Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 11:08 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:20:43PM -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> > > > > I have the following strange problem with a FreeBSD amanda server
> > > > > running 2.5.1p3 and a Fedora 7 Linux client running the same. The
> > > > > last
> > > >
> > > > See bug 244916 in Redhat's Bugzilla.
> > >
> > > I tried the workaround, which is adding
> > >
> > >         flags                   = IPv4
> > >
> > > to /etc/xinetd.d/amanda on the client, but last night's backup failed
> > > again. I'm wondering if the problem is really applicable to me, because
> > > both the client and server already talk IPv6... unless Amanda has
> > > problems with IPv6?
> >
> > Can amanda 2.5.1p3 really talk IPv6? I think it doesn't support it at
> > all.
>
> Looks like you're right - I see your bug #198351 in RedHat bugzilla. Any
> idea when we might see Amanda 2.5.2 in FC7 updates? And until then,
> ought I just to downgrade xinetd to the last known working version?
>
> - Julian

Amanda 2.5.2 will not go to F7, there's no need for such a big upgrade and it
can possibly even cause new problems. It will be in next release of Fedora. 
Actually, it's already there, you can download it from 'rawhide' if you want 
(probably not :-)).