ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Administration Center Future

2014-12-23 13:23:58
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Administration Center Future
From: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:21:55 +0100
Have to agree with Wanda on the last point, no. Its strange TSM is the only
backup product I manage that had a good working (web) interface, dropped it
and never got a good working one ever since.

I have been using the light weighted TSMManager for years myself and know
of a couple of others that do the job much better than the one supplied by
IBM. Must be a prio thing.
Op 11 dec. 2014 18:54 schreef "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT icfi DOT com>:

>
> >>Does IBM have some document or website that describes the future of
> Administration Center?
> Don't know where to find the document, but have been told in presentations:
>
> >>Will it ever be upgraded to keep in lockstep with the TSM version and
> functionality?
> No.  It is "stabilized" at 6.3.4, but if you put on the last patch
> available it will support 7.x servers (obviously not with any of the new
> functions in 7.x servers)
>
> >>Will it's administrative capabilities be moved to Operations Center?
> Essentially yes.  There may be a few things that never make it to OC, but
> the intent is that the OC is the admin GUI for the future.
>
>
> >>I'm trying to decide whether to keep it up-to-date, in order to connect
> it to my 7.1.1 implementation.  I'd rather not make this effort if this
> functionality would appear in Operations Center soon.
> If you put on the last available patch from the download pages, that's the
> last one you have to do!
> The 7.1.1 OC has scheduling in it now; once they also add mgmt. class
> support, that will be the majority of things you need to make it a viable
> replacement for the AC.
>
>
> >>On the other hand... is anyone happy using Administration Center to
> manager their TSM 7.1.1 instance?
> Nooooooooooo!!!  :>)
>
>
> Wanda Prather
> TSM Consultant
> ICF International Cybersecurity Division
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>