ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN

2014-02-26 10:40:46
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN
From: "Huebner, Andy" <andy.huebner AT NOVARTIS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:35:12 +0000
Is it worth the work?
Are there any VTLs involved?

I may be doing 4 TSM servers to 18x 3952's, 8x LTO6 shared drives and 120x 
LTO1's for each server non-shared in multiple DataDomains.  I also have LANFree 
clients that do not support redundant fabrics.

Thank you,

Andy Huebner


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Mike De Gasperis
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:44 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN

We utilize a redundant tape SAN at our main data centers with multiple host 
site HBA ports. Using the Atape control and data path fail-over options we have 
twelve device entries for each physical tape device. Works really well and this 
is in an AIX/LPAR/VIO environment, we've virtualized the HBA ports and are 
using NPIV. We have some scripts created that rename each rmt entry via chdev 
to utilize the last four digits of the WWPN and the AIX fiber channel adapter 
to make things easier to line up as well when defining drives in TSM.

----- Original Message -----
Is anyone using redundant tape SAN with TSM on AIX?

Andy Huebner
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>