ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 ALMS and uncleaned drives

2013-09-13 11:23:05
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 ALMS and uncleaned drives
From: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:20:40 +0000
My recollection is that when the 3584 was set up autoclean the drives, it 
caused one or two entries in the errpt when it did a drive clean.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:08 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 ALMS and uncleaned drives

After three years in a data center in which actual physical tapes were
forbidden, I'm now doing penance in a smaller data center using a
honest-to-god 3584 with ALMS.

To my surprise, I'm seeing entries in an AIX 6.1 error report that some of
my tape drives need cleaning, and I'm finding corresponding ANR8914I
messages in my activity log. This makes me fear that the ALMS automated
cleaning isn't happening. (The first alternate proposal is that I'm
expecting too much.)

If it matters, we're using 3592 drives, not LTO drives. Also, TSM 6.2 on
AIX 6.1.

Is this a sign that we need to update our 3584 microcode? Is there some
interaction between the 3584 and AIX that prompts the 3584 to notify AIX
instead of just quietly cleaning the drive?

(I'm so happy that DataDomain's 3584 emulation didn't strive to match these
nuances....)

Nick