ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Suite for Unified Recovery

2011-06-12 21:20:40
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Suite for Unified Recovery
From: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:17:39 +1000
Part of the problem is that companies would like to standardize on TSM
and related products, but don't want to be repeatedly stung for point
solutions.  eg if they use DB2, there is no cost for the TSM client, but
MSSQL or Oracle there is.  Some organizations just want the
all-you-can-eat approach.

Most of my clients have tended to be government agencies.  These like to
keep as much data for as long as possible, because someone might be held
responsible in the unlikely event that data was not available when
required - it is easier to defer decisions indefinitely.  For these, and
for SarbOx constrained firms the burden  of paying for all that dead
weight will be intolerable...  be aware that once you go volume pricing
you cannot go back.

Just watch for the inevitable requests for periodic exports or
backupsets to keep old data without having to pay for it.
In some cases it may be better to use TSM for short term, strategic
backup (say up to a  year) but use Amanda/bacula or some other cheap
solution for your longer term retentions.

Regards

Steve.


Steven Harris,
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia



On 12/06/2011 4:23 PM, Grigori Solonovitch wrote:
I have some questions about this article, maybe they are strange, but anyway:
What is this:
- try to push customers to use TSM 6?
- try to implement new pricing policy?
- totally new product instead of Tivoli Storage Manager (from licensing point 
of view)?
- something else?

Grigori G. Solonovitch

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
David E Ehresman
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 7:00 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Suite for Unified Recovery

I haven't heard anyone talking about this recently announced offering.
Is IBM finally responding to complaints about their pricing structure?
Is it really likely to contain costs?

http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/1/897/ENUS211-201/ENUS211-201.PDF


Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail 
message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. 
The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If 
you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, disclosure, 
copying or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your 
computer system. We do not guarantee that this message or any attachment to it 
is secure or free from errors, computer viruses or other conditions that may 
damage or interfere with data, hardware or software.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>