Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?

Subject:	Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?
From:	"Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:23:27 -0400

>>But they -do- fit in the same library.

>>I'm having lots of fun with them so far.  My TSM DBs (2 at a time) are
getting
>>120MB/s sustained data rate to them.

>>-YUM-

>>- Allen S. Rout

What's the right emoticon for green with jealousy?!?
Wanda

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, (continued) Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Luke Dahl Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, asr Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Bob Booth - CITES Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, asr Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, David Nicholson Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Dearman, Richard Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Michael Short Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Richard Sims Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Bill Fitzgerald Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Prather, Wanda Re: ?continue using 3590's or convert to LTO tape?, Prather, Wanda <=