Re: SAP and 3494 performance.
2001-03-21 11:25:39
Subject: |
Re: SAP and 3494 performance. |
From: |
William Boyer <wboyer AT PTD DOT NET> |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:25:56 -0500 |
Why not just set the MIGPROCESS=5 when you lower the migration threshold? Do
yo find the MOVE DATA more effecient than the MIGRATION processes?
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- SAP and 3494 performance., Francisco Molero
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., John Naylor
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- FW: SAP and 3494 performance., Norback, Jan
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance.,
William Boyer <=
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., John Naylor
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Nicholas Cassimatis
|
|
|