Re: ADSM and Exchange
2015-10-04 17:38:07
Hi Fredric,
I need to disagree with you on this one. The 'problem' is with =
Microsoft.
Their APIs DO NOT allow 'brick-level' backups. BackupExec, and any =
other
product that offers brick-level Exchange backups are doing so by the =
back
door ie not using the Microsoft supplied APIs.
Yes, these products may work now, but will they continue to work with =
the
next version of Exchange?
IBM could have implemented brick-level backups as BackedExec has done. =
But
they chose to stick 100% to the supplied APIs. Personally I feel very
comfortable with that. I would not have the same level of comfort with
products that do things outside vendor supplied APIs.
Trevor
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, (continued)
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Nathan King
- ADSM and Exchange, Joel Cooper [mailto:jocooper
- ADSM and Exchange, Joel Cooper [mailto:jocooper
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Arni Eggertsson
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Arni Eggertsson
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Del Hoobler
- Re: Re: ADSM and Exchange, ADSML
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, ADSML [mailto:adsml
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Arni Eggertsson [mailto:arnie
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Landreville , Frederic [mailto:Fred_Landreville
- Re: ADSM and Exchange,
Trevor Foley [mailto:Trevor.Foley <=
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Trevor Foley [mailto:Trevor.Foley
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, ELS
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Richard C . Dempsey [mailto:dempsey
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Remeta , Mark
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, ADSML [mailto:adsml
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Chris Zaremba
- Re: ADSM and Exchange, Chris Zaremba [mailto:zaremba
|
|
|