Re: Update copygroup question
1998-02-24 16:59:06
In <0012900002759397000002*@MHS>, on 02/24/98
at 03:07 PM, Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM> said:
>Reinhard -
>You are correct and I was wrong :-(
>I did some research and tests here, and found some things I
>am not quite comfortable with. I set up an Archive
>copygroup with 10 days retention, archived a file, then
>changed the copygroup to 30 days, and then activated the
>changes. Sure enough, the file now had a 30 day retention.
>I checked my V2 manuals, and the Update Copygroup command
>says that the changes are applied to all files bound to
>this class. This is consistent with what I found, and what
>you pointed out.
(snip)
I agree with the way it works. It is what I would expect.
I come from and MVS storage management background and this
is how DFsms works. And the ADSM design was modeled on MVS
dfsms, at least the policy part was.
"Policy" is paramount! If the managers are paying attention
and decree a change in policy, the techies can turn one
knob and effect the change for all the backups in ADSM and
all future backups. Now if only the managers could
understand the power they have with ADSM!
Bill Colwell
Draper Lab
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Update copygroup question, Lio FROST-AINLEY
- Update copygroup question, Jerry Lawson
- Update copygroup question, Reinhard Mersch
- Update copygroup question, Jerry Lawson
- Re: Update copygroup question, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Update copygroup question, Trevor Foley
- Re: Update copygroup question,
Bill Colwell <=
- Update copygroup question, Reinhard Mersch
- Re: Update copygroup question, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Update copygroup question, Jerry Lawson
- Update copygroup question, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Update copygroup question, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Re: Update copygroup question, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Update copygroup question, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
|
|
|